<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wrong About TDD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ontheheap.com/2008/10/30/wrong-about-tdd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ontheheap.com/2008/10/30/wrong-about-tdd/</link>
	<description>Doing things well in software development; by Stephen Rylander</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 08:26:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TDD-Einsichten &#171; Stefan Roock</title>
		<link>http://blog.ontheheap.com/2008/10/30/wrong-about-tdd/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>TDD-Einsichten &#171; Stefan Roock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ontheheap.wordpress.com/?p=54#comment-59</guid>
		<description>[...] Siehe hier: http://blog.ontheheap.com/2008/10/30/wrong-about-tdd/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Siehe hier: <a href="http://blog.ontheheap.com/2008/10/30/wrong-about-tdd/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.ontheheap.com/2008/10/30/wrong-about-tdd/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://blog.ontheheap.com/2008/10/30/wrong-about-tdd/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 01:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ontheheap.wordpress.com/?p=54#comment-41</guid>
		<description>Agree, agree, agree. Whenever I heard &quot;TDD&quot; I thought unit tests and code coverage and would do these things post-implementation. My mind is bending around to the true meaning and am seeing all the advantages you have espoused. 

I am still not doing TDD religiously due to the &quot;I don&#039;t have time&quot; argument, but what I am doing is asking myself &quot;how would I test this?&quot; as I write my code. The result is, I am sure, not as good as if I did write my tests first, but it is resulting in better code than my usual brain to keyboard to editor chain with little processing in the flow.

Actually, I think the real cause of my reticence in not doing TDD is that I am not suitably familiar with test tools and libraries and it is the learning of those tools that requires the upfront time investment. If I can get myself to a state where I can start a new project and with little effort have my test environment set and ready to go I am sure I would be head down hammering out those tests.

Good post.

Anthony.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree, agree, agree. Whenever I heard &#8220;TDD&#8221; I thought unit tests and code coverage and would do these things post-implementation. My mind is bending around to the true meaning and am seeing all the advantages you have espoused. </p>
<p>I am still not doing TDD religiously due to the &#8220;I don&#8217;t have time&#8221; argument, but what I am doing is asking myself &#8220;how would I test this?&#8221; as I write my code. The result is, I am sure, not as good as if I did write my tests first, but it is resulting in better code than my usual brain to keyboard to editor chain with little processing in the flow.</p>
<p>Actually, I think the real cause of my reticence in not doing TDD is that I am not suitably familiar with test tools and libraries and it is the learning of those tools that requires the upfront time investment. If I can get myself to a state where I can start a new project and with little effort have my test environment set and ready to go I am sure I would be head down hammering out those tests.</p>
<p>Good post.</p>
<p>Anthony.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
